Mip-NeRF 360

Mip-NeRF 360 is a collection of four indoor and five outdoor object-centric scenes. The camera trajectory is an orbit around the object with fixed elevation and radius. The test set takes each n-th frame of the trajectory as test views.

Web: https://jonbarron.info/mipnerf360/
Paper: Mip-NeRF 360: Unbounded Anti-Aliased Neural Radiance Fields
Authors: Jonathan T. Barron, Ben Mildenhall, Dor Verbin, Pratul P. Srinivasan, Peter Hedman
Method PSNR SSIM LPIPS (VGG) Time GPU mem.
COLMAP 16.67 0.445 0.590 2h 52m 55s 0.00 MB
garden 18.87 0.468 0.477 1h 35m 12s 0.00 MB
bicycle 18.29 0.352 0.644 3h 19m 55s 0.00 MB
flowers 14.50 0.257 0.634 1h 51m 21s 0.00 MB
treehill 15.73 0.340 0.726 1h 6m 41s 0.00 MB
stump 19.65 0.366 0.646 3h 6m 50s 0.00 MB
kitchen 17.35 0.497 0.575 3h 31m 29s 0.00 MB
bonsai 14.06 0.548 0.586 3h 45m 27s 0.00 MB
counter 15.04 0.549 0.520 3h 45m 10s 0.00 MB
room 16.55 0.628 0.505 3h 54m 6s 0.00 MB
Instant NGP 25.51 0.684 0.398 3m 54s 7.79 GB
garden 24.78 0.654 0.346 3m 57s 6.86 GB
bicycle 23.00 0.526 0.489 3m 37s 6.29 GB
flowers 20.54 0.462 0.478 4m 2s 6.26 GB
treehill 22.36 0.528 0.526 3m 40s 6.51 GB
stump 23.84 0.590 0.439 3m 52s 6.07 GB
kitchen 29.02 0.844 0.255 4m 19s 9.52 GB
bonsai 30.30 0.890 0.295 3m 33s 9.61 GB
counter 26.56 0.812 0.373 4m 10s 9.25 GB
room 29.16 0.850 0.383 3m 59s 9.73 GB
NerfStudio 26.39 0.731 0.343 19m 30s 5.86 GB
garden 25.89
Paper's PSNR: 26.47
0.752
Paper's SSIM: 0.774
0.254
Paper's LPIPS (VGG): 0.235
19m 31s 5.30 GB
bicycle 23.58
Paper's PSNR: 24.08
0.567
Paper's SSIM: 0.599
0.456
Paper's LPIPS (VGG): 0.422
19m 12s 5.15 GB
flowers 21.16 0.511 0.434 19m 6s 5.22 GB
treehill 22.85 0.549 0.488 19m 31s 5.24 GB
stump 25.81
Paper's PSNR: 24.78
0.697
Paper's SSIM: 0.662
0.353
Paper's LPIPS (VGG): 0.38
18m 53s 5.15 GB
kitchen 29.92
Paper's PSNR: 30.29
0.883
Paper's SSIM: 0.89
0.200
Paper's LPIPS (VGG): 0.19
20m 5s 6.66 GB
bonsai 30.59
Paper's PSNR: 32.16
0.907
Paper's SSIM: 0.933
0.249
Paper's LPIPS (VGG): 0.197
19m 46s 6.66 GB
counter 27.09
Paper's PSNR: 27.2
0.830
Paper's SSIM: 0.843
0.336
Paper's LPIPS (VGG): 0.314
19m 28s 6.66 GB
room 30.61
Paper's PSNR: 30.89
0.880
Paper's SSIM: 0.896
0.315
Paper's LPIPS (VGG): 0.296
19m 53s 6.66 GB
2D Gaussian Splatting 26.81
Paper's PSNR: 27.04

Authors evaluated on larger images which were downscaled to the target size (avoiding JPEG compression artifacts) instead of using the official provided downscaled images. As mentioned in the 3DGS paper, this increases results slightly ~0.5 dB PSNR.

 0.796
Paper's SSIM: 0.805

Authors evaluated on larger images which were downscaled to the target size (avoiding JPEG compression artifacts) instead of using the official provided downscaled images. As mentioned in the 3DGS paper, this increases results slightly ~0.5 dB PSNR.

 0.297 31m 10s 13.16 GB
garden 26.69
Paper's PSNR: 26.95

Authors evaluated on larger images which were downscaled to the target size (avoiding JPEG compression artifacts) instead of using the official provided downscaled images. As mentioned in the 3DGS paper, this increases results slightly ~0.5 dB PSNR.

 0.843
Paper's SSIM: 0.852

Authors evaluated on larger images which were downscaled to the target size (avoiding JPEG compression artifacts) instead of using the official provided downscaled images. As mentioned in the 3DGS paper, this increases results slightly ~0.5 dB PSNR.

 0.166 27m 56s 8.58 GB
bicycle 24.77
Paper's PSNR: 24.87

Authors evaluated on larger images which were downscaled to the target size (avoiding JPEG compression artifacts) instead of using the official provided downscaled images. As mentioned in the 3DGS paper, this increases results slightly ~0.5 dB PSNR.

 0.733
Paper's SSIM: 0.752

Authors evaluated on larger images which were downscaled to the target size (avoiding JPEG compression artifacts) instead of using the official provided downscaled images. As mentioned in the 3DGS paper, this increases results slightly ~0.5 dB PSNR.

 0.302 33m 18s 11.96 GB
flowers 21.14
Paper's PSNR: 21.15

Authors evaluated on larger images which were downscaled to the target size (avoiding JPEG compression artifacts) instead of using the official provided downscaled images. As mentioned in the 3DGS paper, this increases results slightly ~0.5 dB PSNR.

 0.572
Paper's SSIM: 0.588

Authors evaluated on larger images which were downscaled to the target size (avoiding JPEG compression artifacts) instead of using the official provided downscaled images. As mentioned in the 3DGS paper, this increases results slightly ~0.5 dB PSNR.

 0.403 26m 31s 7.64 GB
treehill 22.36
Paper's PSNR: 22.27

Authors evaluated on larger images which were downscaled to the target size (avoiding JPEG compression artifacts) instead of using the official provided downscaled images. As mentioned in the 3DGS paper, this increases results slightly ~0.5 dB PSNR.

 0.616
Paper's SSIM: 0.627

Authors evaluated on larger images which were downscaled to the target size (avoiding JPEG compression artifacts) instead of using the official provided downscaled images. As mentioned in the 3DGS paper, this increases results slightly ~0.5 dB PSNR.

 0.433 28m 44s 8.81 GB
stump 26.20
Paper's PSNR: 26.47

Authors evaluated on larger images which were downscaled to the target size (avoiding JPEG compression artifacts) instead of using the official provided downscaled images. As mentioned in the 3DGS paper, this increases results slightly ~0.5 dB PSNR.

 0.758
Paper's SSIM: 0.765

Authors evaluated on larger images which were downscaled to the target size (avoiding JPEG compression artifacts) instead of using the official provided downscaled images. As mentioned in the 3DGS paper, this increases results slightly ~0.5 dB PSNR.

 0.299 29m 12s 28.56 GB
kitchen 30.41
Paper's PSNR: 30.5

Authors evaluated on larger images which were downscaled to the target size (avoiding JPEG compression artifacts) instead of using the official provided downscaled images. As mentioned in the 3DGS paper, this increases results slightly ~0.5 dB PSNR.

 0.916
Paper's SSIM: 0.919

Authors evaluated on larger images which were downscaled to the target size (avoiding JPEG compression artifacts) instead of using the official provided downscaled images. As mentioned in the 3DGS paper, this increases results slightly ~0.5 dB PSNR.

 0.179 35m 31s 15.79 GB
bonsai 31.30
Paper's PSNR: 31.52

Authors evaluated on larger images which were downscaled to the target size (avoiding JPEG compression artifacts) instead of using the official provided downscaled images. As mentioned in the 3DGS paper, this increases results slightly ~0.5 dB PSNR.

 0.931
Paper's SSIM: 0.933

Authors evaluated on larger images which were downscaled to the target size (avoiding JPEG compression artifacts) instead of using the official provided downscaled images. As mentioned in the 3DGS paper, this increases results slightly ~0.5 dB PSNR.

 0.280 33m 16s 15.39 GB
counter 28.10
Paper's PSNR: 28.55

Authors evaluated on larger images which were downscaled to the target size (avoiding JPEG compression artifacts) instead of using the official provided downscaled images. As mentioned in the 3DGS paper, this increases results slightly ~0.5 dB PSNR.

 0.892
Paper's SSIM: 0.9

Authors evaluated on larger images which were downscaled to the target size (avoiding JPEG compression artifacts) instead of using the official provided downscaled images. As mentioned in the 3DGS paper, this increases results slightly ~0.5 dB PSNR.

 0.292 32m 38s 9.95 GB
room 30.37
Paper's PSNR: 31.06

Authors evaluated on larger images which were downscaled to the target size (avoiding JPEG compression artifacts) instead of using the official provided downscaled images. As mentioned in the 3DGS paper, this increases results slightly ~0.5 dB PSNR.

 0.906
Paper's SSIM: 0.912

Authors evaluated on larger images which were downscaled to the target size (avoiding JPEG compression artifacts) instead of using the official provided downscaled images. As mentioned in the 3DGS paper, this increases results slightly ~0.5 dB PSNR.

 0.317 33m 20s 11.74 GB
gsplat 27.41 0.815 0.256 29m 19s 8.30 GB
garden 27.49
Paper's PSNR: 27.39
0.868
Paper's SSIM: 0.87
0.120 39m 56s 12.52 GB
bicycle 25.26
Paper's PSNR: 25.29
0.766
Paper's SSIM: 0.77
0.237 35m 41s 11.75 GB
flowers 21.59 0.603 0.368 26m 2s 8.64 GB
treehill 22.57 0.635 0.377 24m 28s 7.79 GB
stump 26.57
Paper's PSNR: 26.51
0.772
Paper's SSIM: 0.77
0.248 26m 40s 9.63 GB
kitchen 30.86
Paper's PSNR: 31.37
0.923
Paper's SSIM: 0.93
0.158 30m 54s 6.79 GB
bonsai 32.13
Paper's PSNR: 32.21
0.941
Paper's SSIM: 0.94
0.254 23m 13s 5.69 GB
counter 28.94
Paper's PSNR: 29.01
0.906
Paper's SSIM: 0.91
0.257 28m 24s 5.79 GB
room 31.30
Paper's PSNR: 31.23
0.916
Paper's SSIM: 0.92
0.286 28m 30s 6.11 GB
Gaussian Opacity Fields 27.42 0.826 0.234 1h 3m 54s 28.44 GB
garden 27.55 0.874 0.115 1h 13m 32s 34.59 GB
bicycle 25.52 0.792 0.197 1h 11m 12s 37.49 GB
flowers 21.71 0.639 0.308 53m 26s 33.63 GB
treehill 22.44 0.643 0.320 57m 48s 33.73 GB
stump 26.99 0.798 0.223 52m 14s 33.82 GB
kitchen 31.23 0.925 0.158 1h 12m 30s 22.96 GB
bonsai 31.94 0.940 0.247 59m 18s 23.38 GB
counter 28.83 0.907 0.258 1h 5m 60s 12.64 GB
room 30.59 0.913 0.282 1h 9m 1s 23.70 GB
Gaussian Splatting 27.43
Paper's PSNR: 27.20
0.814
Paper's SSIM: 0.815
0.257
Paper's LPIPS (VGG): 0.214
23m 25s 11.14 GB
garden 27.34
Paper's PSNR: 27.41
0.866
Paper's SSIM: 0.868
0.124
Paper's LPIPS (VGG): 0.103
28m 58s 14.75 GB
bicycle 25.21
Paper's PSNR: 25.246
0.764
Paper's SSIM: 0.771
0.240
Paper's LPIPS (VGG): 0.205
28m 25s 14.90 GB
flowers 21.60
Paper's PSNR: 21.52
0.604
Paper's SSIM: 0.605
0.367
Paper's LPIPS (VGG): 0.336
20m 53s 10.01 GB
treehill 22.44
Paper's PSNR: 22.49
0.631
Paper's SSIM: 0.638
0.377
Paper's LPIPS (VGG): 0.317
20m 51s 11.36 GB
stump 26.58
Paper's PSNR: 26.55
0.771
Paper's SSIM: 0.775
0.250
Paper's LPIPS (VGG): 0.21
22m 30s 12.53 GB
kitchen 31.14
Paper's PSNR: 30.317
0.926
Paper's SSIM: 0.922
0.155
Paper's LPIPS (VGG): 0.129
25m 35s 9.75 GB
bonsai 32.20
Paper's PSNR: 31.98
0.941
Paper's SSIM: 0.938
0.254
Paper's LPIPS (VGG): 0.205
19m 15s 8.35 GB
counter 28.96
Paper's PSNR: 28.7
0.907
Paper's SSIM: 0.905
0.258
Paper's LPIPS (VGG): 0.204
21m 53s 8.55 GB
room 31.43
Paper's PSNR: 30.632
0.917
Paper's SSIM: 0.914
0.287
Paper's LPIPS (VGG): 0.22
22m 23s 10.05 GB
Mip-Splatting 27.49
Paper's PSNR: 27.79

Authors evaluated on larger images which were downscaled to the target size (avoiding JPEG compression artifacts) instead of using the official provided downscaled images. As mentioned in the 3DGS paper, this increases results slightly ~0.5 dB PSNR.

 0.815
Paper's SSIM: 0.827

Authors evaluated on larger images which were downscaled to the target size (avoiding JPEG compression artifacts) instead of using the official provided downscaled images. As mentioned in the 3DGS paper, this increases results slightly ~0.5 dB PSNR.

 0.258
Paper's LPIPS (VGG): 0.203

Authors evaluated on larger images which were downscaled to the target size (avoiding JPEG compression artifacts) instead of using the official provided downscaled images. As mentioned in the 3DGS paper, this increases results slightly ~0.5 dB PSNR.

 25m 37s 11.01 GB
garden 27.47
Paper's PSNR: 27.76

Authors evaluated on larger images which were downscaled to the target size (avoiding JPEG compression artifacts) instead of using the official provided downscaled images. As mentioned in the 3DGS paper, this increases results slightly ~0.5 dB PSNR.

 0.869
Paper's SSIM: 0.875

Authors evaluated on larger images which were downscaled to the target size (avoiding JPEG compression artifacts) instead of using the official provided downscaled images. As mentioned in the 3DGS paper, this increases results slightly ~0.5 dB PSNR.

 0.124
Paper's LPIPS (VGG): 0.103

Authors evaluated on larger images which were downscaled to the target size (avoiding JPEG compression artifacts) instead of using the official provided downscaled images. As mentioned in the 3DGS paper, this increases results slightly ~0.5 dB PSNR.

 30m 6s 13.45 GB
bicycle 25.25
Paper's PSNR: 25.72

Authors evaluated on larger images which were downscaled to the target size (avoiding JPEG compression artifacts) instead of using the official provided downscaled images. As mentioned in the 3DGS paper, this increases results slightly ~0.5 dB PSNR.

 0.765
Paper's SSIM: 0.78

Authors evaluated on larger images which were downscaled to the target size (avoiding JPEG compression artifacts) instead of using the official provided downscaled images. As mentioned in the 3DGS paper, this increases results slightly ~0.5 dB PSNR.

 0.243
Paper's LPIPS (VGG): 0.206

Authors evaluated on larger images which were downscaled to the target size (avoiding JPEG compression artifacts) instead of using the official provided downscaled images. As mentioned in the 3DGS paper, this increases results slightly ~0.5 dB PSNR.

 33m 19s 15.07 GB
flowers 21.60
Paper's PSNR: 21.93

Authors evaluated on larger images which were downscaled to the target size (avoiding JPEG compression artifacts) instead of using the official provided downscaled images. As mentioned in the 3DGS paper, this increases results slightly ~0.5 dB PSNR.

 0.605
Paper's SSIM: 0.623

Authors evaluated on larger images which were downscaled to the target size (avoiding JPEG compression artifacts) instead of using the official provided downscaled images. As mentioned in the 3DGS paper, this increases results slightly ~0.5 dB PSNR.

 0.371
Paper's LPIPS (VGG): 0.331

Authors evaluated on larger images which were downscaled to the target size (avoiding JPEG compression artifacts) instead of using the official provided downscaled images. As mentioned in the 3DGS paper, this increases results slightly ~0.5 dB PSNR.

 22m 47s 9.90 GB
treehill 22.65
Paper's PSNR: 22.98

Authors evaluated on larger images which were downscaled to the target size (avoiding JPEG compression artifacts) instead of using the official provided downscaled images. As mentioned in the 3DGS paper, this increases results slightly ~0.5 dB PSNR.

 0.633
Paper's SSIM: 0.655

Authors evaluated on larger images which were downscaled to the target size (avoiding JPEG compression artifacts) instead of using the official provided downscaled images. As mentioned in the 3DGS paper, this increases results slightly ~0.5 dB PSNR.

 0.381
Paper's LPIPS (VGG): 0.32

Authors evaluated on larger images which were downscaled to the target size (avoiding JPEG compression artifacts) instead of using the official provided downscaled images. As mentioned in the 3DGS paper, this increases results slightly ~0.5 dB PSNR.

 22m 49s 9.79 GB
stump 26.64
Paper's PSNR: 26.94

Authors evaluated on larger images which were downscaled to the target size (avoiding JPEG compression artifacts) instead of using the official provided downscaled images. As mentioned in the 3DGS paper, this increases results slightly ~0.5 dB PSNR.

 0.774
Paper's SSIM: 0.786

Authors evaluated on larger images which were downscaled to the target size (avoiding JPEG compression artifacts) instead of using the official provided downscaled images. As mentioned in the 3DGS paper, this increases results slightly ~0.5 dB PSNR.

 0.251
Paper's LPIPS (VGG): 0.209

Authors evaluated on larger images which were downscaled to the target size (avoiding JPEG compression artifacts) instead of using the official provided downscaled images. As mentioned in the 3DGS paper, this increases results slightly ~0.5 dB PSNR.

 25m 8s 12.49 GB
kitchen 31.25
Paper's PSNR: 31.55

Authors evaluated on larger images which were downscaled to the target size (avoiding JPEG compression artifacts) instead of using the official provided downscaled images. As mentioned in the 3DGS paper, this increases results slightly ~0.5 dB PSNR.

 0.926
Paper's SSIM: 0.933

Authors evaluated on larger images which were downscaled to the target size (avoiding JPEG compression artifacts) instead of using the official provided downscaled images. As mentioned in the 3DGS paper, this increases results slightly ~0.5 dB PSNR.

 0.155
Paper's LPIPS (VGG): 0.113

Authors evaluated on larger images which were downscaled to the target size (avoiding JPEG compression artifacts) instead of using the official provided downscaled images. As mentioned in the 3DGS paper, this increases results slightly ~0.5 dB PSNR.

 27m 47s 9.50 GB
bonsai 31.96
Paper's PSNR: 32.31

Authors evaluated on larger images which were downscaled to the target size (avoiding JPEG compression artifacts) instead of using the official provided downscaled images. As mentioned in the 3DGS paper, this increases results slightly ~0.5 dB PSNR.

 0.941
Paper's SSIM: 0.948

Authors evaluated on larger images which were downscaled to the target size (avoiding JPEG compression artifacts) instead of using the official provided downscaled images. As mentioned in the 3DGS paper, this increases results slightly ~0.5 dB PSNR.

 0.254
Paper's LPIPS (VGG): 0.173

Authors evaluated on larger images which were downscaled to the target size (avoiding JPEG compression artifacts) instead of using the official provided downscaled images. As mentioned in the 3DGS paper, this increases results slightly ~0.5 dB PSNR.

 20m 49s 8.98 GB
counter 29.04
Paper's PSNR: 29.16

Authors evaluated on larger images which were downscaled to the target size (avoiding JPEG compression artifacts) instead of using the official provided downscaled images. As mentioned in the 3DGS paper, this increases results slightly ~0.5 dB PSNR.

 0.907
Paper's SSIM: 0.916

Authors evaluated on larger images which were downscaled to the target size (avoiding JPEG compression artifacts) instead of using the official provided downscaled images. As mentioned in the 3DGS paper, this increases results slightly ~0.5 dB PSNR.

 0.258
Paper's LPIPS (VGG): 0.179

Authors evaluated on larger images which were downscaled to the target size (avoiding JPEG compression artifacts) instead of using the official provided downscaled images. As mentioned in the 3DGS paper, this increases results slightly ~0.5 dB PSNR.

 23m 21s 9.03 GB
room 31.54
Paper's PSNR: 31.74

Authors evaluated on larger images which were downscaled to the target size (avoiding JPEG compression artifacts) instead of using the official provided downscaled images. As mentioned in the 3DGS paper, this increases results slightly ~0.5 dB PSNR.

 0.918
Paper's SSIM: 0.928

Authors evaluated on larger images which were downscaled to the target size (avoiding JPEG compression artifacts) instead of using the official provided downscaled images. As mentioned in the 3DGS paper, this increases results slightly ~0.5 dB PSNR.

 0.286
Paper's LPIPS (VGG): 0.192

Authors evaluated on larger images which were downscaled to the target size (avoiding JPEG compression artifacts) instead of using the official provided downscaled images. As mentioned in the 3DGS paper, this increases results slightly ~0.5 dB PSNR.

 24m 25s 10.85 GB
3DGS-MCMC 27.57 0.798 0.281 35m 8s 21.58 GB
garden 27.81
Paper's PSNR: 28.16

Authors evaluated on larger images which were downscaled to the target size (avoiding JPEG compression artifacts) instead of using the official provided downscaled images. As mentioned in the 3DGS paper, this increases results slightly ~0.5 dB PSNR.

 0.877
Paper's SSIM: 0.89

Authors evaluated on larger images which were downscaled to the target size (avoiding JPEG compression artifacts) instead of using the official provided downscaled images. As mentioned in the 3DGS paper, this increases results slightly ~0.5 dB PSNR.

 0.109 48m 5s 35.23 GB
bicycle 25.69
Paper's PSNR: 26.15

Authors evaluated on larger images which were downscaled to the target size (avoiding JPEG compression artifacts) instead of using the official provided downscaled images. As mentioned in the 3DGS paper, this increases results slightly ~0.5 dB PSNR.

 0.799
Paper's SSIM: 0.81

Authors evaluated on larger images which were downscaled to the target size (avoiding JPEG compression artifacts) instead of using the official provided downscaled images. As mentioned in the 3DGS paper, this increases results slightly ~0.5 dB PSNR.

 0.194 49m 28s 38.87 GB
flowers 19.38 0.420 0.572 10m 20s 5.53 GB
treehill 21.94 0.550 0.567 10m 16s 5.58 GB
stump 27.38
Paper's PSNR: 27.8

Authors evaluated on larger images which were downscaled to the target size (avoiding JPEG compression artifacts) instead of using the official provided downscaled images. As mentioned in the 3DGS paper, this increases results slightly ~0.5 dB PSNR.

 0.811
Paper's SSIM: 0.82

Authors evaluated on larger images which were downscaled to the target size (avoiding JPEG compression artifacts) instead of using the official provided downscaled images. As mentioned in the 3DGS paper, this increases results slightly ~0.5 dB PSNR.

 0.200 40m 48s 34.43 GB
kitchen 31.91
Paper's PSNR: 32.27

Authors evaluated on larger images which were downscaled to the target size (avoiding JPEG compression artifacts) instead of using the official provided downscaled images. As mentioned in the 3DGS paper, this increases results slightly ~0.5 dB PSNR.

 0.933
Paper's SSIM: 0.94

Authors evaluated on larger images which were downscaled to the target size (avoiding JPEG compression artifacts) instead of using the official provided downscaled images. As mentioned in the 3DGS paper, this increases results slightly ~0.5 dB PSNR.

 0.148 42m 32s 20.35 GB
bonsai 32.66
Paper's PSNR: 32.88

Authors evaluated on larger images which were downscaled to the target size (avoiding JPEG compression artifacts) instead of using the official provided downscaled images. As mentioned in the 3DGS paper, this increases results slightly ~0.5 dB PSNR.

 0.947
Paper's SSIM: 0.95

Authors evaluated on larger images which were downscaled to the target size (avoiding JPEG compression artifacts) instead of using the official provided downscaled images. As mentioned in the 3DGS paper, this increases results slightly ~0.5 dB PSNR.

 0.236 35m 14s 14.88 GB
counter 29.32
Paper's PSNR: 29.51

Authors evaluated on larger images which were downscaled to the target size (avoiding JPEG compression artifacts) instead of using the official provided downscaled images. As mentioned in the 3DGS paper, this increases results slightly ~0.5 dB PSNR.

 0.916
Paper's SSIM: 0.92

Authors evaluated on larger images which were downscaled to the target size (avoiding JPEG compression artifacts) instead of using the official provided downscaled images. As mentioned in the 3DGS paper, this increases results slightly ~0.5 dB PSNR.

 0.238 38m 44s 20.42 GB
room 32.05
Paper's PSNR: 32.48

Authors evaluated on larger images which were downscaled to the target size (avoiding JPEG compression artifacts) instead of using the official provided downscaled images. As mentioned in the 3DGS paper, this increases results slightly ~0.5 dB PSNR.

 0.927
Paper's SSIM: 0.94

Authors evaluated on larger images which were downscaled to the target size (avoiding JPEG compression artifacts) instead of using the official provided downscaled images. As mentioned in the 3DGS paper, this increases results slightly ~0.5 dB PSNR.

 0.262 40m 43s 18.96 GB
Mip-NeRF 360 27.68
Paper's PSNR: 27.69
0.792
Paper's SSIM: 0.792
0.272
Paper's LPIPS (VGG): 0.237
30h 14m 36s 33.61 GB
garden 27.00
Paper's PSNR: 26.98
0.814
Paper's SSIM: 0.813
0.189
Paper's LPIPS (VGG): 0.17
30h 13m 41s 33.06 GB
bicycle 24.28
Paper's PSNR: 24.37
0.686
Paper's SSIM: 0.685
0.329
Paper's LPIPS (VGG): 0.301
30h 14m 19s 32.86 GB
flowers 21.74
Paper's PSNR: 21.73
0.583
Paper's SSIM: 0.583
0.371
Paper's LPIPS (VGG): 0.344
30h 13m 53s 32.78 GB
treehill 22.89
Paper's PSNR: 22.87
0.633
Paper's SSIM: 0.632
0.378
Paper's LPIPS (VGG): 0.339
30h 13m 9s 32.98 GB
stump 26.50
Paper's PSNR: 26.4
0.749
Paper's SSIM: 0.744
0.298
Paper's LPIPS (VGG): 0.261
30h 15m 5s 32.88 GB
kitchen 32.10
Paper's PSNR: 32.23
0.919
Paper's SSIM: 0.92
0.155
Paper's LPIPS (VGG): 0.127
30h 15m 15s 34.48 GB
bonsai 33.48
Paper's PSNR: 33.46
0.940
Paper's SSIM: 0.941
0.211
Paper's LPIPS (VGG): 0.176
30h 13m 6s 34.48 GB
counter 29.51
Paper's PSNR: 29.55
0.894
Paper's SSIM: 0.894
0.252
Paper's LPIPS (VGG): 0.204
30h 14m 4s 34.47 GB
room 31.64
Paper's PSNR: 31.63
0.912
Paper's SSIM: 0.913
0.267
Paper's LPIPS (VGG): 0.211
30h 18m 49s 34.47 GB
Scaffold-GS 27.71 0.813 0.262 23m 28s 8.72 GB
garden 27.50
Paper's PSNR: 27.17
0.863
Paper's SSIM: 0.842
0.136 21m 46s 7.91 GB
bicycle 25.19
Paper's PSNR: 24.5
0.759
Paper's SSIM: 0.705
0.259 20m 38s 7.37 GB
flowers 21.44 0.592 0.382 20m 23s 6.90 GB
treehill 23.15 0.640 0.373 20m 17s 6.48 GB
stump 26.59
Paper's PSNR: 26.27
0.766
Paper's SSIM: 0.784
0.277 17m 1s 6.22 GB
kitchen 31.59
Paper's PSNR: 31.3
0.927
Paper's SSIM: 0.928
0.156 33m 25s 10.97 GB
bonsai 32.58
Paper's PSNR: 32.7
0.943
Paper's SSIM: 0.946
0.249 24m 33s 10.94 GB
counter 29.48
Paper's PSNR: 29.34
0.910
Paper's SSIM: 0.914
0.256 28m 34s 10.38 GB
room 31.89
Paper's PSNR: 31.93
0.922
Paper's SSIM: 0.925
0.275 24m 37s 11.28 GB
Zip-NeRF 28.55
Paper's PSNR: 28.54
0.829
Paper's SSIM: 0.828
0.218
Paper's LPIPS (VGG): 0.189
5h 30m 20s 26.82 GB
garden 28.19
Paper's PSNR: 28.2
0.864
Paper's SSIM: 0.86
0.127
Paper's LPIPS (VGG): 0.118
5h 19m 14s 26.77 GB
bicycle 25.89
Paper's PSNR: 25.8
0.775
Paper's SSIM: 0.769
0.226
Paper's LPIPS (VGG): 0.208
5h 22m 47s 26.74 GB
flowers 22.33
Paper's PSNR: 22.4
0.637
Paper's SSIM: 0.642
0.310
Paper's LPIPS (VGG): 0.273
5h 16m 23s 26.75 GB
treehill 24.01
Paper's PSNR: 23.89
0.677
Paper's SSIM: 0.681
0.279
Paper's LPIPS (VGG): 0.242
5h 48m 6s 26.75 GB
stump 27.41
Paper's PSNR: 27.55
0.792
Paper's SSIM: 0.8
0.233
Paper's LPIPS (VGG): 0.193
5h 25m 16s 26.74 GB
kitchen 32.35
Paper's PSNR: 32.5
0.929
Paper's SSIM: 0.928
0.134
Paper's LPIPS (VGG): 0.116
5h 39m 34s 26.92 GB
bonsai 34.68
Paper's PSNR: 34.46
0.951
Paper's SSIM: 0.949
0.195
Paper's LPIPS (VGG): 0.173
5h 35m 52s 26.92 GB
counter 29.13
Paper's PSNR: 29.38
0.905
Paper's SSIM: 0.902
0.223
Paper's LPIPS (VGG): 0.185
5h 39m 53s 26.91 GB
room 32.99
Paper's PSNR: 32.65
0.928
Paper's SSIM: 0.925
0.237
Paper's LPIPS (VGG): 0.196
5h 25m 53s 26.91 GB

PSNR

Peak Signal to Noise Ratio. The higher the better.

Method garden bicycle flowers treehill stump kitchen bonsai counter room
COLMAP 18.87 18.29 14.50 15.73 19.65 17.35 14.06 15.04 16.55
Instant NGP 24.78 23.00 20.54 22.36 23.84 29.02 30.30 26.56 29.16
NerfStudio 25.89
Paper's PSNR: 26.47
23.58
Paper's PSNR: 24.08
21.16 22.85 25.81
Paper's PSNR: 24.78
29.92
Paper's PSNR: 30.29
30.59
Paper's PSNR: 32.16
27.09
Paper's PSNR: 27.2
30.61
Paper's PSNR: 30.89
2D Gaussian Splatting 26.69
Paper's PSNR: 26.95

Authors evaluated on larger images which were downscaled to the target size (avoiding JPEG compression artifacts) instead of using the official provided downscaled images. As mentioned in the 3DGS paper, this increases results slightly ~0.5 dB PSNR.

 24.77
Paper's PSNR: 24.87

Authors evaluated on larger images which were downscaled to the target size (avoiding JPEG compression artifacts) instead of using the official provided downscaled images. As mentioned in the 3DGS paper, this increases results slightly ~0.5 dB PSNR.

 21.14
Paper's PSNR: 21.15

Authors evaluated on larger images which were downscaled to the target size (avoiding JPEG compression artifacts) instead of using the official provided downscaled images. As mentioned in the 3DGS paper, this increases results slightly ~0.5 dB PSNR.

 22.36
Paper's PSNR: 22.27

Authors evaluated on larger images which were downscaled to the target size (avoiding JPEG compression artifacts) instead of using the official provided downscaled images. As mentioned in the 3DGS paper, this increases results slightly ~0.5 dB PSNR.

 26.20
Paper's PSNR: 26.47

Authors evaluated on larger images which were downscaled to the target size (avoiding JPEG compression artifacts) instead of using the official provided downscaled images. As mentioned in the 3DGS paper, this increases results slightly ~0.5 dB PSNR.

 30.41
Paper's PSNR: 30.5

Authors evaluated on larger images which were downscaled to the target size (avoiding JPEG compression artifacts) instead of using the official provided downscaled images. As mentioned in the 3DGS paper, this increases results slightly ~0.5 dB PSNR.

 31.30
Paper's PSNR: 31.52

Authors evaluated on larger images which were downscaled to the target size (avoiding JPEG compression artifacts) instead of using the official provided downscaled images. As mentioned in the 3DGS paper, this increases results slightly ~0.5 dB PSNR.

 28.10
Paper's PSNR: 28.55

Authors evaluated on larger images which were downscaled to the target size (avoiding JPEG compression artifacts) instead of using the official provided downscaled images. As mentioned in the 3DGS paper, this increases results slightly ~0.5 dB PSNR.

 30.37
Paper's PSNR: 31.06

Authors evaluated on larger images which were downscaled to the target size (avoiding JPEG compression artifacts) instead of using the official provided downscaled images. As mentioned in the 3DGS paper, this increases results slightly ~0.5 dB PSNR.
gsplat 27.49
Paper's PSNR: 27.39
25.26
Paper's PSNR: 25.29
21.59 22.57 26.57
Paper's PSNR: 26.51
30.86
Paper's PSNR: 31.37
32.13
Paper's PSNR: 32.21
28.94
Paper's PSNR: 29.01
31.30
Paper's PSNR: 31.23
Gaussian Opacity Fields 27.55 25.52 21.71 22.44 26.99 31.23 31.94 28.83 30.59
Gaussian Splatting 27.34
Paper's PSNR: 27.41
25.21
Paper's PSNR: 25.246
21.60
Paper's PSNR: 21.52
22.44
Paper's PSNR: 22.49
26.58
Paper's PSNR: 26.55
31.14
Paper's PSNR: 30.317
32.20
Paper's PSNR: 31.98
28.96
Paper's PSNR: 28.7
31.43
Paper's PSNR: 30.632
Mip-Splatting 27.47
Paper's PSNR: 27.76

Authors evaluated on larger images which were downscaled to the target size (avoiding JPEG compression artifacts) instead of using the official provided downscaled images. As mentioned in the 3DGS paper, this increases results slightly ~0.5 dB PSNR.

 25.25
Paper's PSNR: 25.72

Authors evaluated on larger images which were downscaled to the target size (avoiding JPEG compression artifacts) instead of using the official provided downscaled images. As mentioned in the 3DGS paper, this increases results slightly ~0.5 dB PSNR.

 21.60
Paper's PSNR: 21.93

Authors evaluated on larger images which were downscaled to the target size (avoiding JPEG compression artifacts) instead of using the official provided downscaled images. As mentioned in the 3DGS paper, this increases results slightly ~0.5 dB PSNR.

 22.65
Paper's PSNR: 22.98

Authors evaluated on larger images which were downscaled to the target size (avoiding JPEG compression artifacts) instead of using the official provided downscaled images. As mentioned in the 3DGS paper, this increases results slightly ~0.5 dB PSNR.

 26.64
Paper's PSNR: 26.94

Authors evaluated on larger images which were downscaled to the target size (avoiding JPEG compression artifacts) instead of using the official provided downscaled images. As mentioned in the 3DGS paper, this increases results slightly ~0.5 dB PSNR.

 31.25
Paper's PSNR: 31.55

Authors evaluated on larger images which were downscaled to the target size (avoiding JPEG compression artifacts) instead of using the official provided downscaled images. As mentioned in the 3DGS paper, this increases results slightly ~0.5 dB PSNR.

 31.96
Paper's PSNR: 32.31

Authors evaluated on larger images which were downscaled to the target size (avoiding JPEG compression artifacts) instead of using the official provided downscaled images. As mentioned in the 3DGS paper, this increases results slightly ~0.5 dB PSNR.

 29.04
Paper's PSNR: 29.16

Authors evaluated on larger images which were downscaled to the target size (avoiding JPEG compression artifacts) instead of using the official provided downscaled images. As mentioned in the 3DGS paper, this increases results slightly ~0.5 dB PSNR.

 31.54
Paper's PSNR: 31.74

Authors evaluated on larger images which were downscaled to the target size (avoiding JPEG compression artifacts) instead of using the official provided downscaled images. As mentioned in the 3DGS paper, this increases results slightly ~0.5 dB PSNR.
3DGS-MCMC 27.81
Paper's PSNR: 28.16

Authors evaluated on larger images which were downscaled to the target size (avoiding JPEG compression artifacts) instead of using the official provided downscaled images. As mentioned in the 3DGS paper, this increases results slightly ~0.5 dB PSNR.

 25.69
Paper's PSNR: 26.15

Authors evaluated on larger images which were downscaled to the target size (avoiding JPEG compression artifacts) instead of using the official provided downscaled images. As mentioned in the 3DGS paper, this increases results slightly ~0.5 dB PSNR.

 19.38 21.94 27.38
Paper's PSNR: 27.8

Authors evaluated on larger images which were downscaled to the target size (avoiding JPEG compression artifacts) instead of using the official provided downscaled images. As mentioned in the 3DGS paper, this increases results slightly ~0.5 dB PSNR.

 31.91
Paper's PSNR: 32.27

Authors evaluated on larger images which were downscaled to the target size (avoiding JPEG compression artifacts) instead of using the official provided downscaled images. As mentioned in the 3DGS paper, this increases results slightly ~0.5 dB PSNR.

 32.66
Paper's PSNR: 32.88

Authors evaluated on larger images which were downscaled to the target size (avoiding JPEG compression artifacts) instead of using the official provided downscaled images. As mentioned in the 3DGS paper, this increases results slightly ~0.5 dB PSNR.

 29.32
Paper's PSNR: 29.51

Authors evaluated on larger images which were downscaled to the target size (avoiding JPEG compression artifacts) instead of using the official provided downscaled images. As mentioned in the 3DGS paper, this increases results slightly ~0.5 dB PSNR.

 32.05
Paper's PSNR: 32.48

Authors evaluated on larger images which were downscaled to the target size (avoiding JPEG compression artifacts) instead of using the official provided downscaled images. As mentioned in the 3DGS paper, this increases results slightly ~0.5 dB PSNR.
Mip-NeRF 360 27.00
Paper's PSNR: 26.98
24.28
Paper's PSNR: 24.37
21.74
Paper's PSNR: 21.73
22.89
Paper's PSNR: 22.87
26.50
Paper's PSNR: 26.4
32.10
Paper's PSNR: 32.23
33.48
Paper's PSNR: 33.46
29.51
Paper's PSNR: 29.55
31.64
Paper's PSNR: 31.63
Scaffold-GS 27.50
Paper's PSNR: 27.17
25.19
Paper's PSNR: 24.5
21.44 23.15 26.59
Paper's PSNR: 26.27
31.59
Paper's PSNR: 31.3
32.58
Paper's PSNR: 32.7
29.48
Paper's PSNR: 29.34
31.89
Paper's PSNR: 31.93
Zip-NeRF 28.19
Paper's PSNR: 28.2
25.89
Paper's PSNR: 25.8
22.33
Paper's PSNR: 22.4
24.01
Paper's PSNR: 23.89
27.41
Paper's PSNR: 27.55
32.35
Paper's PSNR: 32.5
34.68
Paper's PSNR: 34.46
29.13
Paper's PSNR: 29.38
32.99
Paper's PSNR: 32.65

SSIM

Structural Similarity Index. The higher the better. The implementation matches JAX's SSIM and torchmetrics's SSIM (with default parameters).

Method garden bicycle flowers treehill stump kitchen bonsai counter room
COLMAP 0.468 0.352 0.257 0.340 0.366 0.497 0.548 0.549 0.628
Instant NGP 0.654 0.526 0.462 0.528 0.590 0.844 0.890 0.812 0.850
NerfStudio 0.752
Paper's SSIM: 0.774
0.567
Paper's SSIM: 0.599
0.511 0.549 0.697
Paper's SSIM: 0.662
0.883
Paper's SSIM: 0.89
0.907
Paper's SSIM: 0.933
0.830
Paper's SSIM: 0.843
0.880
Paper's SSIM: 0.896
2D Gaussian Splatting 0.843
Paper's SSIM: 0.852

Authors evaluated on larger images which were downscaled to the target size (avoiding JPEG compression artifacts) instead of using the official provided downscaled images. As mentioned in the 3DGS paper, this increases results slightly ~0.5 dB PSNR.

 0.733
Paper's SSIM: 0.752

Authors evaluated on larger images which were downscaled to the target size (avoiding JPEG compression artifacts) instead of using the official provided downscaled images. As mentioned in the 3DGS paper, this increases results slightly ~0.5 dB PSNR.

 0.572
Paper's SSIM: 0.588

Authors evaluated on larger images which were downscaled to the target size (avoiding JPEG compression artifacts) instead of using the official provided downscaled images. As mentioned in the 3DGS paper, this increases results slightly ~0.5 dB PSNR.

 0.616
Paper's SSIM: 0.627

Authors evaluated on larger images which were downscaled to the target size (avoiding JPEG compression artifacts) instead of using the official provided downscaled images. As mentioned in the 3DGS paper, this increases results slightly ~0.5 dB PSNR.

 0.758
Paper's SSIM: 0.765

Authors evaluated on larger images which were downscaled to the target size (avoiding JPEG compression artifacts) instead of using the official provided downscaled images. As mentioned in the 3DGS paper, this increases results slightly ~0.5 dB PSNR.

 0.916
Paper's SSIM: 0.919

Authors evaluated on larger images which were downscaled to the target size (avoiding JPEG compression artifacts) instead of using the official provided downscaled images. As mentioned in the 3DGS paper, this increases results slightly ~0.5 dB PSNR.

 0.931
Paper's SSIM: 0.933

Authors evaluated on larger images which were downscaled to the target size (avoiding JPEG compression artifacts) instead of using the official provided downscaled images. As mentioned in the 3DGS paper, this increases results slightly ~0.5 dB PSNR.

 0.892
Paper's SSIM: 0.9

Authors evaluated on larger images which were downscaled to the target size (avoiding JPEG compression artifacts) instead of using the official provided downscaled images. As mentioned in the 3DGS paper, this increases results slightly ~0.5 dB PSNR.

 0.906
Paper's SSIM: 0.912

Authors evaluated on larger images which were downscaled to the target size (avoiding JPEG compression artifacts) instead of using the official provided downscaled images. As mentioned in the 3DGS paper, this increases results slightly ~0.5 dB PSNR.
gsplat 0.868
Paper's SSIM: 0.87
0.766
Paper's SSIM: 0.77
0.603 0.635 0.772
Paper's SSIM: 0.77
0.923
Paper's SSIM: 0.93
0.941
Paper's SSIM: 0.94
0.906
Paper's SSIM: 0.91
0.916
Paper's SSIM: 0.92
Gaussian Opacity Fields 0.874 0.792 0.639 0.643 0.798 0.925 0.940 0.907 0.913
Gaussian Splatting 0.866
Paper's SSIM: 0.868
0.764
Paper's SSIM: 0.771
0.604
Paper's SSIM: 0.605
0.631
Paper's SSIM: 0.638
0.771
Paper's SSIM: 0.775
0.926
Paper's SSIM: 0.922
0.941
Paper's SSIM: 0.938
0.907
Paper's SSIM: 0.905
0.917
Paper's SSIM: 0.914
Mip-Splatting 0.869
Paper's SSIM: 0.875

Authors evaluated on larger images which were downscaled to the target size (avoiding JPEG compression artifacts) instead of using the official provided downscaled images. As mentioned in the 3DGS paper, this increases results slightly ~0.5 dB PSNR.

 0.765
Paper's SSIM: 0.78

Authors evaluated on larger images which were downscaled to the target size (avoiding JPEG compression artifacts) instead of using the official provided downscaled images. As mentioned in the 3DGS paper, this increases results slightly ~0.5 dB PSNR.

 0.605
Paper's SSIM: 0.623

Authors evaluated on larger images which were downscaled to the target size (avoiding JPEG compression artifacts) instead of using the official provided downscaled images. As mentioned in the 3DGS paper, this increases results slightly ~0.5 dB PSNR.

 0.633
Paper's SSIM: 0.655

Authors evaluated on larger images which were downscaled to the target size (avoiding JPEG compression artifacts) instead of using the official provided downscaled images. As mentioned in the 3DGS paper, this increases results slightly ~0.5 dB PSNR.

 0.774
Paper's SSIM: 0.786

Authors evaluated on larger images which were downscaled to the target size (avoiding JPEG compression artifacts) instead of using the official provided downscaled images. As mentioned in the 3DGS paper, this increases results slightly ~0.5 dB PSNR.

 0.926
Paper's SSIM: 0.933

Authors evaluated on larger images which were downscaled to the target size (avoiding JPEG compression artifacts) instead of using the official provided downscaled images. As mentioned in the 3DGS paper, this increases results slightly ~0.5 dB PSNR.

 0.941
Paper's SSIM: 0.948

Authors evaluated on larger images which were downscaled to the target size (avoiding JPEG compression artifacts) instead of using the official provided downscaled images. As mentioned in the 3DGS paper, this increases results slightly ~0.5 dB PSNR.

 0.907
Paper's SSIM: 0.916

Authors evaluated on larger images which were downscaled to the target size (avoiding JPEG compression artifacts) instead of using the official provided downscaled images. As mentioned in the 3DGS paper, this increases results slightly ~0.5 dB PSNR.

 0.918
Paper's SSIM: 0.928

Authors evaluated on larger images which were downscaled to the target size (avoiding JPEG compression artifacts) instead of using the official provided downscaled images. As mentioned in the 3DGS paper, this increases results slightly ~0.5 dB PSNR.
3DGS-MCMC 0.877
Paper's SSIM: 0.89

Authors evaluated on larger images which were downscaled to the target size (avoiding JPEG compression artifacts) instead of using the official provided downscaled images. As mentioned in the 3DGS paper, this increases results slightly ~0.5 dB PSNR.

 0.799
Paper's SSIM: 0.81

Authors evaluated on larger images which were downscaled to the target size (avoiding JPEG compression artifacts) instead of using the official provided downscaled images. As mentioned in the 3DGS paper, this increases results slightly ~0.5 dB PSNR.

 0.420 0.550 0.811
Paper's SSIM: 0.82

Authors evaluated on larger images which were downscaled to the target size (avoiding JPEG compression artifacts) instead of using the official provided downscaled images. As mentioned in the 3DGS paper, this increases results slightly ~0.5 dB PSNR.

 0.933
Paper's SSIM: 0.94

Authors evaluated on larger images which were downscaled to the target size (avoiding JPEG compression artifacts) instead of using the official provided downscaled images. As mentioned in the 3DGS paper, this increases results slightly ~0.5 dB PSNR.

 0.947
Paper's SSIM: 0.95

Authors evaluated on larger images which were downscaled to the target size (avoiding JPEG compression artifacts) instead of using the official provided downscaled images. As mentioned in the 3DGS paper, this increases results slightly ~0.5 dB PSNR.

 0.916
Paper's SSIM: 0.92

Authors evaluated on larger images which were downscaled to the target size (avoiding JPEG compression artifacts) instead of using the official provided downscaled images. As mentioned in the 3DGS paper, this increases results slightly ~0.5 dB PSNR.

 0.927
Paper's SSIM: 0.94

Authors evaluated on larger images which were downscaled to the target size (avoiding JPEG compression artifacts) instead of using the official provided downscaled images. As mentioned in the 3DGS paper, this increases results slightly ~0.5 dB PSNR.
Mip-NeRF 360 0.814
Paper's SSIM: 0.813
0.686
Paper's SSIM: 0.685
0.583
Paper's SSIM: 0.583
0.633
Paper's SSIM: 0.632
0.749
Paper's SSIM: 0.744
0.919
Paper's SSIM: 0.92
0.940
Paper's SSIM: 0.941
0.894
Paper's SSIM: 0.894
0.912
Paper's SSIM: 0.913
Scaffold-GS 0.863
Paper's SSIM: 0.842
0.759
Paper's SSIM: 0.705
0.592 0.640 0.766
Paper's SSIM: 0.784
0.927
Paper's SSIM: 0.928
0.943
Paper's SSIM: 0.946
0.910
Paper's SSIM: 0.914
0.922
Paper's SSIM: 0.925
Zip-NeRF 0.864
Paper's SSIM: 0.86
0.775
Paper's SSIM: 0.769
0.637
Paper's SSIM: 0.642
0.677
Paper's SSIM: 0.681
0.792
Paper's SSIM: 0.8
0.929
Paper's SSIM: 0.928
0.951
Paper's SSIM: 0.949
0.905
Paper's SSIM: 0.902
0.928
Paper's SSIM: 0.925

LPIPS (VGG)

Learned Perceptual Image Patch Similarity. The lower the better. The implementation uses VGG backbone and matches lpips pip package with checkpoint version 0.1

Method garden bicycle flowers treehill stump kitchen bonsai counter room
COLMAP 0.477 0.644 0.634 0.726 0.646 0.575 0.586 0.520 0.505
Instant NGP 0.346 0.489 0.478 0.526 0.439 0.255 0.295 0.373 0.383
NerfStudio 0.254
Paper's LPIPS (VGG): 0.235
0.456
Paper's LPIPS (VGG): 0.422
0.434 0.488 0.353
Paper's LPIPS (VGG): 0.38
0.200
Paper's LPIPS (VGG): 0.19
0.249
Paper's LPIPS (VGG): 0.197
0.336
Paper's LPIPS (VGG): 0.314
0.315
Paper's LPIPS (VGG): 0.296
2D Gaussian Splatting 0.166 0.302 0.403 0.433 0.299 0.179 0.280 0.292 0.317
gsplat 0.120 0.237 0.368 0.377 0.248 0.158 0.254 0.257 0.286
Gaussian Opacity Fields 0.115 0.197 0.308 0.320 0.223 0.158 0.247 0.258 0.282
Gaussian Splatting 0.124
Paper's LPIPS (VGG): 0.103
0.240
Paper's LPIPS (VGG): 0.205
0.367
Paper's LPIPS (VGG): 0.336
0.377
Paper's LPIPS (VGG): 0.317
0.250
Paper's LPIPS (VGG): 0.21
0.155
Paper's LPIPS (VGG): 0.129
0.254
Paper's LPIPS (VGG): 0.205
0.258
Paper's LPIPS (VGG): 0.204
0.287
Paper's LPIPS (VGG): 0.22
Mip-Splatting 0.124
Paper's LPIPS (VGG): 0.103

Authors evaluated on larger images which were downscaled to the target size (avoiding JPEG compression artifacts) instead of using the official provided downscaled images. As mentioned in the 3DGS paper, this increases results slightly ~0.5 dB PSNR.

 0.243
Paper's LPIPS (VGG): 0.206

Authors evaluated on larger images which were downscaled to the target size (avoiding JPEG compression artifacts) instead of using the official provided downscaled images. As mentioned in the 3DGS paper, this increases results slightly ~0.5 dB PSNR.

 0.371
Paper's LPIPS (VGG): 0.331

Authors evaluated on larger images which were downscaled to the target size (avoiding JPEG compression artifacts) instead of using the official provided downscaled images. As mentioned in the 3DGS paper, this increases results slightly ~0.5 dB PSNR.

 0.381
Paper's LPIPS (VGG): 0.32

Authors evaluated on larger images which were downscaled to the target size (avoiding JPEG compression artifacts) instead of using the official provided downscaled images. As mentioned in the 3DGS paper, this increases results slightly ~0.5 dB PSNR.

 0.251
Paper's LPIPS (VGG): 0.209

Authors evaluated on larger images which were downscaled to the target size (avoiding JPEG compression artifacts) instead of using the official provided downscaled images. As mentioned in the 3DGS paper, this increases results slightly ~0.5 dB PSNR.

 0.155
Paper's LPIPS (VGG): 0.113

Authors evaluated on larger images which were downscaled to the target size (avoiding JPEG compression artifacts) instead of using the official provided downscaled images. As mentioned in the 3DGS paper, this increases results slightly ~0.5 dB PSNR.

 0.254
Paper's LPIPS (VGG): 0.173

Authors evaluated on larger images which were downscaled to the target size (avoiding JPEG compression artifacts) instead of using the official provided downscaled images. As mentioned in the 3DGS paper, this increases results slightly ~0.5 dB PSNR.

 0.258
Paper's LPIPS (VGG): 0.179

Authors evaluated on larger images which were downscaled to the target size (avoiding JPEG compression artifacts) instead of using the official provided downscaled images. As mentioned in the 3DGS paper, this increases results slightly ~0.5 dB PSNR.

 0.286
Paper's LPIPS (VGG): 0.192

Authors evaluated on larger images which were downscaled to the target size (avoiding JPEG compression artifacts) instead of using the official provided downscaled images. As mentioned in the 3DGS paper, this increases results slightly ~0.5 dB PSNR.
3DGS-MCMC 0.109 0.194 0.572 0.567 0.200 0.148 0.236 0.238 0.262
Mip-NeRF 360 0.189
Paper's LPIPS (VGG): 0.17
0.329
Paper's LPIPS (VGG): 0.301
0.371
Paper's LPIPS (VGG): 0.344
0.378
Paper's LPIPS (VGG): 0.339
0.298
Paper's LPIPS (VGG): 0.261
0.155
Paper's LPIPS (VGG): 0.127
0.211
Paper's LPIPS (VGG): 0.176
0.252
Paper's LPIPS (VGG): 0.204
0.267
Paper's LPIPS (VGG): 0.211
Scaffold-GS 0.136 0.259 0.382 0.373 0.277 0.156 0.249 0.256 0.275
Zip-NeRF 0.127
Paper's LPIPS (VGG): 0.118
0.226
Paper's LPIPS (VGG): 0.208
0.310
Paper's LPIPS (VGG): 0.273
0.279
Paper's LPIPS (VGG): 0.242
0.233
Paper's LPIPS (VGG): 0.193
0.134
Paper's LPIPS (VGG): 0.116
0.195
Paper's LPIPS (VGG): 0.173
0.223
Paper's LPIPS (VGG): 0.185
0.237
Paper's LPIPS (VGG): 0.196